Legal Opinion

Poplin v. PPG Industries

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 3, 1992No. 9210IC499PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

Defendant’s only argument is that the Industrial Commission erred by ordering defendant to pay attorneys’ fees. Specifically, defendant contends that the order is not supported by adequate conclusions of law or findings of fact and that the findings of fact are not supported by the evidence. We disagree.

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-88.1 provides:

If the Industrial Commission shall determine that any hearing has been brought, prosecuted, or defended without reasonable ground, it may assess the whole cost of the proceedings including reasonable fees for defendant’s attorney or plaintiffs…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sparks v. Mountain Breeze Restaurant & Fish House, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Taylor v. J. P. Stevens Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. Robinson v. JP Stevens and Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Mullinax v. Fieldcrest Cannon, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Troutman v. White & Simpson, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  2. Estes v. N.C. State UniversityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  3. Clayton v. Mini Data FormsNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 2008
  4. Myers v. Bbf Printing SolutionsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API