Myers v. Bbf Printing Solutions
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWynn, Judge
I concur with the majority in affirming the Full Commission's award of total disability benefits to Mr. Myers. However, because I conclude that BBF Printing Solutions's abandonment of its appeal does not altogether negate its existence, I would affirm the Commission's award of attorney's fees to Mr. Myers. From that portion of the majority's opinion, I therefore respectfully dissent.
North Carolina General Statute § 97-88 refers to the Industrial Commission's "find[ing] that such hearing or proceedings were brought by the insurer" as a necessary step to ordering the insurer to pay attorney's…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Taylor v. J. P. Stevens Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Estes v. N.C. State UniversityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- Rackley v. Coastal PaintingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Brown v. Public Works CommissionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- Cox v. City of Winston-SalemCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.