Legal Opinion

Mailhot v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 25, 1930PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

The evidence in its aspect most favorable to the plaintiffs tended to show that they were proceeding in a coupe automobile on a wide cement highway in the town of South Easton, at about twenty minutes before four o’clock of a dark and clear morning, at a rate of *279speed of about twenty-five to twenty-eight miles an hour; that they had travelled over this highway occasionally before; that the highway intersected at right angles a single-track railroad of the defendant; that when about ten feet away the male plaintiff, who was driving, first saw a freight train across the highway, without light…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Menard v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  2. Trask v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  3. Pigeon v. Massachusetts Northeastern Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  4. Toledo Term. Rd. Co. v. HughesOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Fortune v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dalley v. Mid-Western Dairy Products Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Gechijian v. Richmond InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  3. Witherly v. Bangor & Aroostook RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1932
  4. Gilmore v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  5. Anderson v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API