Mailhot v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
The evidence in its aspect most favorable to the plaintiffs tended to show that they were proceeding in a coupe automobile on a wide cement highway in the town of South Easton, at about twenty minutes before four o’clock of a dark and clear morning, at a rate of *279speed of about twenty-five to twenty-eight miles an hour; that they had travelled over this highway occasionally before; that the highway intersected at right angles a single-track railroad of the defendant; that when about ten feet away the male plaintiff, who was driving, first saw a freight train across the highway, without light…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Menard v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
- Trask v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Pigeon v. Massachusetts Northeastern Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
- Toledo Term. Rd. Co. v. HughesOhio Supreme Court · 1926
- Fortune v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dalley v. Mid-Western Dairy Products Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1932
- Gechijian v. Richmond InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Witherly v. Bangor & Aroostook RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1932
- Gilmore v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Anderson v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.