Legal Opinion

Gilmore v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 1, 1938PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

This is an action of tort by the operator of an automobile to recover compensation for personal injuries and property damage arising from a collision between his automobile and the locomotive of a moving passenger train *304of the defendant, at a grade crossing on a highway in Worcester known as Lincoln Square, on January 1, 1933. The plaintiff’s declaration was in five counts. The first count alleged negligence of the defendant in the management of its locomotive and train; the second count alleged failure of the defendant to give the statutory signal specified by G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 160, § 138;…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fortune v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  2. Lundergan v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  3. Jones v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  4. Klegerman v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  5. Anthony v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kenney v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  2. Brown v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  3. Papageorge v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  4. Dole v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  5. Gove v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API