Legal Opinion

Downen v. Allstate Insurance Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1991PublishedCited by 161 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, Justice.

In this worker’s compensation action, the trial judge sustained the defendant Allstate’s motion for summary judgment, holding that, as a matter of law, the expert medical proof was insufficient to support an award to the employee’s widow for worker’s compensation death benefits. The widow appeals, contending that the deposition of her deceased husband’s physician raises genuine issues of material fact as to whether her husband’s heart attack arose out of his employment. We agree and reverse.

FACTS

The plaintiff’s husband, Hugh Downen (“Downen”), was an over-the-road…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Tindall v. Waring Park Ass'nTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Bowman v. HenardTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Price v. Mercury Supply Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1984
  4. Jones v. Home Indemnity Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1983
  5. P & L Const. Co., Inc. v. LankfordTennessee Supreme Court · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by161 opinions

  1. Byrd v. HallTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Bain v. WellsTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Staples v. CBL & Associates, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Carvell v. BottomsTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Godfrey v. RuizTennessee Supreme Court · 2002

156 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API