Legal Opinion

Carter v. Anderson

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 30, 2009No. 08-3372PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judge.

Death row inmate Clarence Carter appeals a district court order denying his claim for relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6). For the following reasons, we AFFIRM.

I. Background

Carter is a death row inmate. The facts giving rise to his conviction, sentence, and habeas petition were set forth in this court’s previous opinion and are incorporated by reference. See Carter v. Mitchell, 448 F.3d 517, 521-24 (6th Cir.2006). The following facts are germane to Carter’s Rule 60(b)(6) motion.

In December 1988, Carter and Johnny Allen were inmates at the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Browder v. Director, Dept. of Corrections of Ill.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Azmond Ali v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  5. Info-Hold, Inc. v. Sound Merchandising, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Abu-Ali Abdur'Rahman v. Wayne CarpenterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  2. Johnson v. BellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  3. Kennedy ex rel. Kennedy v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  4. Michael Williamson v. Recovery Limited PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  5. Lawrence Landrum v. Carl AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API