Legal Opinion

Lawrence Landrum v. Carl Anderson

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 12, 2016No. 14-3591PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JULIA SMITH GIBBONS, Circuit Judge.

Lawrence Landrum appeals the district comb’s denial of his motion to reopen his petition for habeas corpus under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Landrum argues that, in light of Martinez v. Ryan, — U.S.—, 132 S.Ct. 1309, 182 L.Ed.2d 272 (2012), and Trevino v. Thaler, — U.S.—, 133 S.Ct. 1911, 185 L.Ed.2d 1044 (2013), the alleged ineffective assistance of his post-conviction counsel enables us to examine the merits of his ineffective-assistance-of-trial-counsel claim, that the district court abused its discretion when it denied his…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Martinez v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Genesis Hill v. Betty MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  2. United States v. Steven FlowersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  3. Lee Moore v. Betty MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  4. Abdelnabi v. BrunDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2025
  5. Brandon v. Warden, Noble Correctional InstitutionDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2023

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API