Legal Opinion

Matter of Estate of Chilton

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 1994No. 18488PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SABERS, Justice.

The half-blood heirs appeal, claiming the trial court erred in holding that the Estate consists only of “ancestral property” to which the whole-blood heirs are entitled to the exclusion of the half-blood heirs. We reverse in part and remand.

FACTS

Jack Parker Chilton (Decedent) died intestate. He left surviving him one aunt as his closest living relative. She disclaimed any interest in the “ancestral property” and is presumed to have predeceased him.

Ronald Ellsbury (Ellsbury), Blanche E. Chilton Coles and Audrey M. Chilton Doane are whole-blood cousins in the fourth degree to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of HobelsbergerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  2. US West Communications, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Dahl v. SittnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Estate of RyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. GMS, INC. v. Deadwood Social Club, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Brim v. South Dakota Board of Pardons & ParolesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Uhlir v. WebbSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. RagatzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Matter of Estate of TallmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Beermann v. BeermannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API