Legal Opinion

Uhlir v. Webb

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1996No. NonePublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERTSON, Justice.

[¶ 1] This appeal arises from a medical malpractice case in which the estate of Stanton Uhlir sued physician’s assistant, David Webb. A jury returned a verdict for Webb. Subsequently, Uhlir filed a motion for a new trial which the trial court granted. Webb appeals, claiming the order granting the new trial was signed after the statutory deadline, and therefore, the motion is necessarily denied by operation of law. We find the trial court’s ruling on the motion for a new trial timely but reverse the trial court’s decision.

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

[¶ 2] Stanton Uhlir entered the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tanner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Shamburger v. BehrensSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. WilkinsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. FinneySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Buchholz v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. FischerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Schmidt v. RoyerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Wayrynen v. ClassSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. BoylesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. WillinghamSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API