Saguilar v. Harkleroad
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
OSTEEN, District Judge.
On September 16, 2004, the United States Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Petitioner filed objections to the Recommendation within the time limit prescribed by Section 636.
The Court has reviewed petitioner’s objections de novo and finds they do not change the substance of the United States Magistrate Judge’s rulings which are affirmed and adopted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that respondents’ motion to dismiss (docket no. 5) is granted, that respondents’ motion for summary judgment (docket no.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Clay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Carey v. SaffoldSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Percy Stanley Harris v. Ronald Hutchinson, Warden, Maryland House of Corrections J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General of the State of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Headen v. BeckDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2005
- CLAWSON v. SUPERINTENDENT, EASTERN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTEDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2024
- KLUTTZ v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINADistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2021
- NEAL v. THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINADistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2022
- Sargeant v. Hess CorporationDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2023