Legal Opinion
Headen v. Beck
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Decided March 28, 2005No. 1:03CV00554PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGMENT
TILLEY, District Judge.
On January 7, 2005, the United States Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. No objections were filed within the time limits prescribed by Section 636.
Therefore, the Court need not make a de novo review and the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation is hereby adopted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the petition for habeas corpus (docket no. 2) is denied, that respondent’s motion for summary judgment (docket no. 5) is granted, that this action is dismissed, and that finding no substantial…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Percy Stanley Harris v. Ronald Hutchinson, Warden, Maryland House of Corrections J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General of the State of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- Sherwood L. Hill v. D. A. Braxton, Buckingham Correctional CenterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
- Sandvik v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- Ott v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Adams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- KLUTTZ v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINADistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2021