Legal Opinion

State v. Williams

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 19, 1989No. 883SC1204PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEWIS, Judge.

I

Defendant argues that the court committed reversible error by denying his motion to dismiss all charges against him upon the completion .of the presentation of evidence by the State.

In determining whether to grant a defendant’s motion to dismiss, the trial court must consider all the evidence admitted in the light most favorable to the State and decide whether there is substantial evidence of each element of the offense charged and that the defendant committed it.

State v. McLaurin, 320 N.C. 143, 146, 357 S.E.2d 636, 638 (1987), citing State v. LeDuc, 306 N.C. 62, 74-5, 291…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. State v. MonkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. State v. LeDucSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. State v. ScottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  5. State v. McLaurinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. BlackmonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  2. State v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API