Legal Opinion

Miller v. Ungar

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 16, 1941PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ADAMS, J:

This is an appeal from a judgment for the defendant based on a jury verdict in an action of tort.

The question is whether the Court erred by refusing to charge on the doctrine of last clear chance.

The plaintiff, an eleven year old boy, sought recovery on the following facts. Plaintiff was riding a bicycle on one of the busy streets of the City of Miami. Defendant’s truck was being operated in the same direction at approximately five miles per hour. It was raining. The left window of the truck was closed making visibility., poor to the driver, except straight ahead. Two motorcycles…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Merchants Transportation Co. v. DanielSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  2. Lindsay v. ThomasSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
  3. Dunn Bus Service, Inc. v. McKinleySupreme Court of Florida · 1937
  4. Becker v. BlumSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
  5. Davis v. CuestaSupreme Court of Florida · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Williams v. SaulsSupreme Court of Florida · 1942
  2. Connolly v. SteakleySupreme Court of Florida · 1967
  3. Falnes v. KaplanSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
  4. Wawner v. Sellic Stone StudioSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  5. Shattuck v. MullenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API