Connolly v. Steakley
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
197 So.2d 524 (1967)
Catherine E. CONNOLLY and Martin J. Connolly, Husband and Wife, Petitioners,
v.
Wiley C. STEAKLEY, Respondent.
No. 33710.
Supreme Court of Florida.
January 25, 1967.
Rehearing Denied April 12, 1967.
Early & Early, Sarasota, for petitioners.
Grimes, Grimes, Goebel & Parry, Bradenton, for respondent.
2Per curiam 1
Writ of certiorari having heretofore issued, argument having been heard, and the court having examined the record and briefs, it appears that the writ was improvidently issued. Accordingly, the writ of certiorari heretofore issued in this cause is discharged.
It is so ordered.
THORNAL,…
Also in this document: Dissent · Drew; Concurrence; Per curiam 2; Dissent · Drew.
3Cases cited45 opinions
- Mosso v. E. H. Stanton Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- Leftridge v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1924
- Merchants Transportation Co. v. DanielSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
- Fine v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1918
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. YniestraSupreme Court of Florida · 1886
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by22 opinions
- Hoffman v. JonesSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
- Jones v. HoffmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
- Rea v. Leadership Housing, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
- Bethel Apostolic Temple v. WiggenSupreme Court of Florida · 1967
- Perdue v. CopelandSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.