Legal Opinion
Gunter v. Stream
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided April 6, 1978No. Appeal No. 77-627PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDWIN, Judge.
This is an appeal from a decision of the Patent and Trademark Office Board of Patent Interferences (board) which awarded priority as to two counts of an interference to junior party, Stream. We affirm.
On August 11, 1975, an interference was declared between Gunter’s application entitled “Heat Pipes for Fin Coolers,” serial No. 507,314, filed on September 19, 1974, and Stream’s application entitled “Method and Apparatus for Controlling the Viscosity of Glass Streams,” serial No. 511,541, filed on October 3, 1974. The two counts of the interference correspond to claims 6 and 8 of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Townsend v. SmithCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
- Mergenthaler v. ScudderCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1897
- Myers v. FeigelmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
- Land v. DreyerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
- Meitzner v. MindickCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
3Cited by14 opinions
- Amgen, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Genetics Institute, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- John H. Coleman v. Martin B. DinesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Jean C. Kridl and Robert M. Goodman v. Francis P. McCormick Kenneth A. Barton, and William F. SwainCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Rohm and Haas Co. v. Dawson Chemical Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1983
- Hitzeman v. RutterCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.