Legal Opinion

S. S. Pierce Co. v. United States

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided December 30, 1936PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

McLELLAN, District Judge.

This action at law was brought to recover certain taxes alleged to have been wrongfully collected by distraint at a time when their collection was barred by the statute of limitations. The parties have stipulated many of the material facts, which are as stipulated. The stipulation is without prejudice to the right of either party to introduce other and further evidence not inconsistent with the facts there set forth. The parties introduced further evidence bearing on certain disputed questions.

The following facts appear, either from the stipulation or from evidence…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. R. H. Stearns Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Florsheim Brothers Drygoods Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Stange v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  5. Bank of the United States v. DANIELSupreme Court of the United States · 1838

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Northwestern Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. E. Henry Wemme Endowment FundOregon Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API