Legal Opinion

Curtis A. Bethea v. State of Indiana

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 2013No. 18S05-1206-PC-304PublishedCited by 152 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVID, Justice.

In his Petition for Post-Conviction Relief, Curtis Bethea argues he received ineffective assistance of counsel for failure to challenge the aggravating factors used by the trial court in determining his sentence. Specifically, he claims a trial court cannot aggravate a defendant’s sentence with an essential element of a charge that was dismissed pursuant to a plea agreement. We hold that the trial court finding that the injury suffered by the victim to be an aggravating factor was proper despite the plea agreement that dismissed that count.

Facts and Procedural History

In…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Cardwell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Anglemyer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Fisher v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Ben-Yisrayl v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by152 opinions

  1. Jose Guzman v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Alberto Baiza Rodriguez v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2019
  3. John R. Myers II v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Justine Archer v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Adam Morris v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013

147 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API