Curtis A. Bethea v. State of Indiana
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DAVID, Justice.
In his Petition for Post-Conviction Relief, Curtis Bethea argues he received ineffective assistance of counsel for failure to challenge the aggravating factors used by the trial court in determining his sentence. Specifically, he claims a trial court cannot aggravate a defendant’s sentence with an essential element of a charge that was dismissed pursuant to a plea agreement. We hold that the trial court finding that the injury suffered by the victim to be an aggravating factor was proper despite the plea agreement that dismissed that count.
Facts and Procedural History
In…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cardwell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
- Anglemyer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
- Fisher v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
- Ben-Yisrayl v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by152 opinions
- Jose Guzman v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Alberto Baiza Rodriguez v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2019
- John R. Myers II v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
- Justine Archer v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2017
- Adam Morris v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
147 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.