Legal Opinion

Ruiz v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided August 3, 1995No. 13-94-194-CRPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FEDERICO G. HINOJOSA, Jr., Justice.

Appellant was charged by information with unlawfully carrying a handgun. Appellant filed a motion to suppress all evidence seized from or relating to a stop and search of his vehicle. The trial court denied the motion to suppress. After a bench trial, the trial court found him guilty and assessed punishment at a fine of $400 and forfeiture of the handgun. By five points of error, appellant complains that the trial court erred or abused its discretion by denying the motion to suppress. We affirm.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Romero v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  4. Meraz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  5. Chambers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Miles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  2. State v. Ayala, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1998
  3. Kunkel v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
  4. United States of America v. Sealed Juvenile 1Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  5. State v. ChavezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API