Legal Opinion
Adams v. Howerton
District Court, C.D. California
Decided February 25, 1980No. CV 79-1003-IHPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORAL OPINION DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH (MODIFIED)
IRVING HILL, Chief Judge:
The Court has before it today cross-motions for summary judgment. Both sides agree that the case is ripe for summary judgment and both agree that there is no bona fide dispute of material fact and that the only issue presented is one of law.
The uncontradicted facts are these: Plaintiff Adams is an American citizen. Plaintiff Sullivan is an Australian citizen who came to this country in 1973 on a non-immigrant visitor’s visa which would have expired on January 7, 1974. Both Plaintiffs are males. On January 5, 1974, two…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Hicks v. MirandaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Fiallo Ex Rel. Rodriguez v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- De Sylva v. BallentineSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Reconstruction Finance Corporation v. Beaver CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Obergefell v. HodgesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Goodridge v. Department of Public HealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
- Lockyer v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Andersen v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- Adams v. HowertonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.