Legal Opinion

Kynerd v. Security Nat. Bank

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 2, 1918No. 8005PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from District Court, Dallas County; W. E. Whitehurst, Judge. Suit by the Security National Bank and another against W. D. Kynerd and others. Judgment for plaintiffs, motion of defendant named for new trial overruled, and he brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtTalbot, J.

The Security National Bank of Dallas, Tex., a corporation created under the laws of the United States, and H. W. Ferguson, as plaintiffs, instituted this suit against W. IX Kynerd, the plaintiff in error, and others, M recover on a note of $12,500, bearing interest at the rate of 10 per cent, per annum, and providing for the payment of 10 per cent.- of the principal and interest of said note as attorney’s fees if the same was placed in the hands of an attorney for collection. The plaintiffs also sought a foreclosure on a certain note for $16,000 charged to have been pledged as collateral…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Faires v. CockerellTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Holliman v. RogersTexas Supreme Court · 1851
  3. Rowe v. HortonTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Barry v. Screwmen's Benevolent Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  5. McCavick v. McBrideCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Michels v. BorutaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  2. Dallas Ry. & Terminal Co. v. RedmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  3. Security Nat. Bank of Dallas v. KynerdTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  4. Dallas Ry. & Terminal Co. v. RedmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  5. Lone Star Gas Co. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API