Legal Opinion

Security Nat. Bank of Dallas v. Kynerd

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided March 2, 1921No. 199-3264PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Court of Civil Appeals of Fifth Supreme Judicial District. Suit by the Security National Bank of Dallas and another against W. D. Kynerd and others. Judgment for plaintiffs was, on appeal of the named defendant alone, reversed by Court of Civil Appeals (207 S. W. 133), and plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtSpencer, J.

Plaintiffs, Security National Bank of Dallas, Tex., and H. W. Ferguson, sued defendants W. D. Kynerd and J. P. Smith, Individually, and Smith, Womack & Son, a copartnership composed of J. Sanford Smith, Jack Womack, and J. P. Smith, upon a promissory note dated February 15, 1916, for the principal sum of $12,500, executed by J. P. Smith and W. D. Kynerd, with H. W. Ferguson as surety, payable to the Security National Bank.

The facts, briefly, are that on December 3, 1915, J. P. Smith and Kynerd executed and delivered their note for the principal sum of $21,500 to plaintiff bank — the same…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Faires v. CockerellTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Kynerd v. Security Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fox v. KroegerTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Brown & Root, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1950
  3. Durham v. McDowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. Lower Neches Valley Authority v. City of BeaumontCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  5. Fox v. KroegerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API