Legal Opinion

Hilmes v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided October 5, 1988No. 88-0575PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, P.J.

This case involves application of the 300-day statute of limitations contained in sec. 111.39, Stats., of the Wisconsin Fair Employment Act (WFEA). The statute requires that sexual discrimination complaints be "filed” within 300 days of the allegedly unlawful "occurrence.” Sec. 111.39(1). The department on appeal argues that the circuit court erroneously defined "filing” as "mailing” rather than as "delivery to the intended recipient.” We agree.

The department also argues that the date on which an act of sexual discrimination "occurs” is the date on which an employee is notified of an…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Chardon v. FernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Dairy Equipment Co. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Hester v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Wisconsin Department of Revenue v. J. C. Penney Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Haas v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. Vollemans v. Town of WallingfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  3. Turner v. IDS Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  4. Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
  5. Currier v. Wisconsin Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API