Oak Grove Farmers Mutual Insurance v. Almena State Bank
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.
The contentions of the parties present the following questions for determination:(1) Was the relationship between the bank and the plaintiff prior to October 28th that of trustee and cestui que trust or that of debtor and creditor ?(2) Assuming that a trust relationship existed up to October 28th or 29th, was that relationship changed to that of debtor and creditor by virtue of the bank’s sending to the plaintiff its cashier’s check, which the plaintiff promptly deposited with its bank for collection ?(3) Assuming that the trust relationship existed, were the collections sufficiently traced…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- McLeod v. EvansWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
- Nonotuck Silk Co. v. FlandersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Hanover State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
- Fogg v. TylerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1912
- Emigh v. EarlingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Minneapolis Fire & Marine Insurance v. Bank of DawsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934