Legal Opinion

New York Telephone Co. v. City of Binghamton

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 7, 1966PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Judge Desmond.

On an agreed statement of facts there was submitted to the Appellate Division this controversy: Is plaintiff telephone company entitled to reimbursement from defendant city for the expense of relocating in another street the company’s telephone lines and other facilities which had lain in a public street, the relocation having been made necessary by the city’s closing part of the street and using the discontinued street section as part of the site for a “ middle income housing project” which site after assemblage thereof by the city was conveyed by the city to a limited…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kaskel v. ImpellitteriNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
  2. Transit Commission v. Long Island RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. Matter of Murray v. LaguardiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  4. In re the City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  5. City of New York v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Karedes v. ColellaNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. MTR. OF CONS. EDISON CO. v. LindsayNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. City & County of Denver v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  4. Northwest Natural Gas Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Diamond Asphalt Corp. v. SanderNew York Court of Appeals · 1998

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API