Beam v. Bennett
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Wayne. (Chambers, J.) Bill to set aside conveyances. Complainant appeals. One who recovers in an' action of tort against another for fraudulent conduct is not defendant’s creditor within the meaning of the act invalidating conveyances as against creditors: Mill v. Bowmcm 35 Mich. 191; Bheahamis Case 25 Mich. 145.
1Opinion of the Court
G-kaves, O. J.
The bill in this cause was filed for the double purpose of aiding an execution and to reach property not open to execution. It is perfectly regular. Williams v. Hubbard Wal. Ch. 28.
In November, 1878, the complainant brought her action at law against the defendant John M. Bennett to recover damages for breach of promise of marriage, and due notice •of trial was given for the term which began May 5, 1879, and the trial was immediately set down to take place on the 28th of the same month. In this interval between the commencement of the term and the day fixed for trial, the…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Schaible v. ArdnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Tolles v. WoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Rilling v. SchultzeTexas Supreme Court · 1902
- Ahlhauser v. DoudWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
- Vanderpool v. NotleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.