Ahlhauser v. Doud
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Milwaukee County. The following statement of the case was prepared by Mr. Justice Taylob as a part of the opinion: This is an action in equity, brought by the respondent against James W. Vail, William II. Landolt, and others.
Read the full summary
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Milwaukee County. The following statement of the case was prepared by Mr. Justice Taylob as a part of the opinion: This is an action in equity, brought by the respondent against James W. Vail, William II. Landolt, and others. So far as the rights of the plaintiff and the appellant Lucinda V. Doud are concerned, the material facts stated in the pleadings are the following: The plaintiff, by his complaint, shows that he had obtained a judgment against James W. Vail and William H. Landolt for upwards of $10,000; that an execution had been duly issued upon such…
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
The learned counsel for the appellant insists, first, that the court had no power, under the allegations of the complaint, to appoint a receiver for any purpose, and especially as to the proceeds of the real estate arising from the condemnation and taking of a part of the real estate in controversy by the railroad company. It is claimed that, so far as the real estate is concerned, the facts stated in the complaint show that the plaintiff can have no further or other relief as against the appellant in this action than can be awarded in an action in equity in aid of an execution which has been…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chautauque County Bank v. . RisleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Jones v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
- Watson v. New York Central RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Cornell v. RadwayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1867
- Hyde v. ChapmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- French Lumbering Co. v. TheriaultWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- Gilbert v. StockmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
- Pierstoff v. JorgesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
- Rozek v. RedzinskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
- Weber v. WeberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.