Legal Opinion
Rilling v. Schultze
Texas Supreme Court
Decided March 31, 1902No. 1094PublishedCited by 11 opinions
Error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Fourth District, in an appeal from Bexar County. Caroline Sehultze sued Billing and others, and appealed from the judgment, Billing assigning cross errors. On its affirmance both parties obtained writs of error.
1Opinion of the Court
GAINES, Chief Justice.
This ease came to the Court of Civil Appeals upon the trial judge’s conclusions of fact and law, no statement of facts having been approved, filed, and made a part of the record.
The following is a statement of the case made by the Court of Civil Appeals, including, in a condensed form, the facts as found by the trial court, and it is sufficiently full and accurate for the purpose of this opinion:
“This suit was brought in the District Court on September 4, 1900, by plaintiff, Caroline Schultze, divorced wife of H. Schultze, Jr., against H. Schultze, Sr., H. Rilling, and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Murphy v. . BriggsNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Beam v. BennettMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Copenheaver v. HuffakerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1845
3Cited by11 opinions
- Stevens v. CobernTexas Supreme Court · 1919
- Gully v. GullyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Foran v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
- Hutchings v. BatesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
- Southern National Insurance v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.