Legal Opinion

Matjasich v. State of Kansas Department of Human Resources

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 20, 2001No. 85,095PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

LOCKETT, J.:

The Kansas Department of Human Resources (KDHR) found that under the Kansas statutes, members of a foreign limited liability company doing business in Kansas are personally and individually Hable for unpaid wages. The members appealed. The district court determined that pursuant to Kansas statutes, the liabihty of members of a foreign limited HabiHty company is governed by the laws of that foreign state. It concluded that under the foreign state’s law and under Kansas law, the members of the Hmited HabiHty company were personally required…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of KillmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  2. Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. AllenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  3. In Re the Appeal of United Teleservices, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1999
  4. In Re Tax Appeal of Alex R. Masson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1995
  5. State v. FritzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Redd v. Kansas Truck CenterSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  2. Cole v. MayansSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  3. Doty v. Frontier Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  4. CPI Qualified Plan Consultants, Inc. v. Kansas Department of Human ResourcesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  5. Saline County Board of County Commissioners v. JensenCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2004

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API