Legal Opinion

Doty v. Frontier Communications, Inc.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 14, 2001No. 86,769PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Larson, J.:

This first impression case raises issues of claimed preemption by the 1996 Federal Telecommunications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 151 etseq. (1994 ed., Supp. V. 2000), and the application of K.S.A. 2000 Supp. 50-6,103 (Kansas Act) of the Kansas Consumer Protection Act (KCPA), K.S.A. 50-623 et seq., to an unauthorized change of an interstate long-distance telephone services carrier (a practice commonly known as “slamming”).

Both parties substantially agree as to the factual and procedural background of the case, but have strikingly divergent views of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Maryland v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. In Re the Marriage of KillmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  3. Babe Houser Motor Co. v. TetreaultSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  4. Graham Ex Rel. Graham v. Wyeth LaboratoriesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1987
  5. Lindemuth v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Northern Natural Gas Co. v. ONEOK Field Services Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  2. Miami County Board of Commissioners v. Kanza Rail-Trails Conservancy, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  3. Zimmerman v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  4. Nanopierce Technologies, Inc. v. Depository Trust & Clearing Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Coma Corp. v. Kansas Department of LaborSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API