Legal Opinion

Schoenberg v. Forrest

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 22, 1952No. 12445PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORVELL, Justice.

This is the second appeal of this case. Our previous opinion is reported in 228 S. W.2d 556, and referred to for a statement of the case, particularly the controlling provisions of the contract involved herein. Upon the first trial Forrest was awarded a recovery of $10,000, but, because of error in submitting the case to the jury, such judgment was reversed. Upon' the trial from which this appeal is prosecuted, a judgment for Forrest in the sum of $123,-200 was rendered.

Appellant vigorously asserts that the trial court erred in refusing to grant his motion for an instructed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Southwest Battery Corp. v. OwenTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Griffin v. . ColverNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  4. Palmer v. Connecticut Railway & Lighting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Thomsen v. CayserSupreme Court of the United States · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State National Bank of El Paso v. Farah Manufacturing Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1984
  2. Fredonia Broadcasting Corporation, Inc. v. Rca CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  3. Atomic Fuel Extraction Corporation v. Slick's EstateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  4. First National Bank of Irving v. Shockley, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1983
  5. McCarley v. Hopkins, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API