Legal Opinion
Thomsen v. Cayser
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 6, 1917No. 2PublishedCited by 108 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
243 U.S. 66 (1917)
THOMSEN ET AL., COMPOSING THE FIRM OF THOMSEN & COMPANY,
v.
CAYSER ET AL., COMPOSING THE FIRM OF CAYSER, IRVINE & COMPANY, ET AL.
No. 2.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued April 28, 29, 1914.
Restored for reargument June 21, 1915.
Reargued January 19, 22, 1917.
Decided March 6, 1917.
ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.
Mr. A. Leo Everett and Mr. Lorenzo Ullo for plaintiffs in error.
Mr. Thomas Thacher and Mr. J. Parker Kirlin, with whom Mr. Charles R. Hickox was on the briefs, for defendants in error.
Restored to docket for reargument June 21, 1915.
MR.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Nash v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Eastern States Retail Lumber Dealers' Ass'n v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by108 opinions
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
- United States v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Continental Ore Co. v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.