Legal Opinion
Visco v. Aiken County
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided September 26, 2013No. Civil Action No. 1:11-01428-JMCPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION
J. MICHELLE CHILDS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Mark Visco (‘Visco”) and Christopher Watson (‘Watson”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”) filed this collective action against Defendant Aiken County, South Carolina (“Defendant” or the “County”), on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219. (See ECF Nos. 1, 49.) Plaintiffs also allege class claims against Defendant under Fed.R.Civ.P. 23 (“Rule 23”) for violation of the South Carolina Payment of Wages Act (“SCPWA”), S.C.Code Ann. §§ 41-10-10…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Linda M. Kocsis v. Multi-Care Management, Inc., D/B/A Bath Manor Special Care CentreCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Rutherford Food Corp. v. McCombSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dean v. Pacific Bellwether, LLCDistrict Court, Northern Mariana Islands · 2014
- Bender v. Epting Distributors Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2024
- Firestone v. Cowboy Brazilian Steakhouse, LLCDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2024
- Spencer v. DocNetwork,IncDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025
- Walsh v. Lava Hot Springs Inn, LLCDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2023