Legal Opinion · Dissent

deSaulles v. Community Hospital of the Monterey Peninsula

California Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 2016No. S219236Published

1Dissent

KRUGER, J.,

Dissenting.—I agree with the majority that a plaintiff who receives a monetary settlement in exchange for the dismissal of her claims has received a “net monetary recovery,” and is therefore a “prevailing party” presumptively entitled to costs under Code of Civil Procedure section 1032, subdivision (a)(4). But by the terms of the statute, so, too, is the “defendant in whose favor . . . dismissal is entered.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 1032, subd. (a)(4) (section 1032(a)(4)).) Because both parties cannot be entitled to costs as of right, such cases are covered by the next sentence of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. People v. CornettCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Desai v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. Larkin v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Wohlgemuth v. Caterpillar Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API