Legal Opinion · Dissent

Branford Baptist Church v. Nichols

California Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1949No. S. F. No. 17406Published

1DissentSchauer, J.

I dissent. It is my view that respondent has failed to meet the burden of proving the illegality of her marriage to Nichols, that the finding of the probate court that respondent is the widow of the testator is without substantial *284support in the evidence, and that the.portion of the judgment appealed from should be reversed.

For what appears to me to be a logical and convincing refutation of the views taken by the majority of this court, reference is made to the opinion prepared by Mr. Presiding Justice Peters for the District Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, Division One, reported…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. ShortsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Hunter v. HunterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Kelsey v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Brigham v. HughsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Estate of FriedmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API