The Roseric
District Court, D. New Jersey
In Admiralty. Suit by the McAllister Lighterage Line, Incorporated, against the British steamship Roseric. On suggestion that writ of arrest be quashed, or suit stayed.
1Opinion of the Court
RK LLSTAB, District Judge.
[1] The libel alleges that on April 16, 1918, the steamship Roseric negligently collided with libelant’s barge McAllister Bros. No. 63, in New York Harbor, to its damage. After seizure by the marshal, within the territorial jurisdiction of this court, the steamship was released by the order of libelant upon an undertaking by the owners to bond her, in case the court should hold that she *156was not immune from process, on grounds to be urged on behalf of the British Ambassador. Thereupon counsel for the British Embassy, appearing by leave of court as amici curias, filed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Schooner Exchange v. McFaddonSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
- The Santissima Trinidad.Supreme Court of the United States · 1822
- The DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- The AttualitaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1916
- The Florence H.District Court, S.D. New York · 1918
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. Deutsches Kal-Isyndikat GesellschaftDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1929
- The RogdaiDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1920
- United States of Mexico v. RaskCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Et Ve Balik Kurumu v. B. N. S. International Sales Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1960
- The NavemarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.