Legal Opinion
United States v. Deutsches Kal-Isyndikat Gesellschaft
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 5, 1929PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BONDY, District Judge.
This is a motion made by the ambassador of France and the defendants Société Commereiale des Potasses d’Alsace, Jean Le Comee, Pierre Gide, Rene Gide, and Walter B. Howe to set aside the service of process upon the said defendants. They contend that they are not amenable to the service, and that the court is without jurisdiction to proceed against them.
The suit was brought by the United States to enjoin violations of the anti-trust laws by the defendants other than the ambassador. After the suit was begun, the French ambassador wrote to the Secretary of State of the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Schooner Exchange v. McFaddonSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
- Sloan Shipyards Corp. v. United States Shipping Bd. Emergency Fleet CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- US Bank v. PLANTERS'BANKSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Berizzi Brothers Co. v. SS PesaroSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United States v. StrangSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Banco Nacional De Cuba v. Chase Manhattan BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- In re Investigation of World Arrangements with Relation to the Production, Transportation, Refining & Distribution of PetroleumDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1952
- McGrath v. Manufacturers Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Sorge v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1968
- In Re Grand Jury Investigation of the Shipping IndustryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1960
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.