Legal Opinion

Harris-Morrison v. Sabert Corporation

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided December 31, 2024No. 1:23-cv-16120Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION TAMIKO HARRIS-MORRISON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) No. 1:23-CV-16120 ) v. ) Judge Edmond E. Chang ) SABERT CORPORATION, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Tamiko Harris-Morrison, while employed by Sabert Corporation, was required to submit to a physical examination during which her genetic information was alleg- edly collected. R. 1-1, Compl. ¶¶ 27–31, 36.1 Harris-Morrison originally brought this proposed class action suit in state court, alleging that Sabert violated the Illinois Ge- netic Information…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Aetna Health Inc. v. DavilaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API