Legal Opinion

Taney v. Fahnley

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1890No. 14,589PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From the Marion Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtOlds, J.

— This is an action for the possession of real estate, brought by the appellants against the appellees, and involves the construction of a deed.

Nathaniel Eudaily owned the real estate in controversy and conveyed the same to his mother, Márgaret Eudaily. The appellee Lena Fahnley claims title through mesne conveyances from said Margaret, and the appellants claim title as the children of Margaret, through the deed of Nathaniel to Margaret, the appellants contending that by said deed Margaret took only a life-estate, and that the fee vested in her children while on behalf of the appellees it is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Shimer v. MannIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Siceloff v. Redman's AdministratorIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Andrews v. SpurlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Hochstedler v. HochstedlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Doe on demise of Patterson v. JackmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1854

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Doren v. GillumIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Chamberlain v. RunkleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902
  3. Lamb v. MedskerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  4. Carter v. Reserve Gas Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. First Nat. Bank of Paris v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API