Legal Opinion

Lamb v. Medsker

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 9, 1905No. 5,579PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From Kosciusko Circuit Court; Edgar llaymond, Special Judge. Action by Mary Lamb and others against Isaac Medsker and others. From a decree for defendants, plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMyers, P. J.

Appellants in the court below began this suit against appellees for possession of, and to quiet title to, 160 acres of real estate in Kosciusko county, Indiana, basing their cause of action upon a certain deed executed by Henry Eord and Phebe, his wife, to Isaac Minear, Jr., and wife, Jane Minear, on January 22, 1838. Omitting the formal parts, description, and the usual covenants, that part of the deed material to this controversy is as follows: “Witnesscth, that said Henry Eord, for and in consideration of the sum of $400 and other good consideration to'him in hand paid by said Isaac…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Allen v. CraftIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Hertz v. AbrahamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  3. Lytle v. . BeveridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  4. Nicholson v. CaressIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Hochstedler v. HochstedlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Dickson v. Van HooseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  2. Wright v. City of TuscaloosaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  3. Reese Howell Co. v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Lee v. LeeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1910
  5. Prindle v. Iowa Soldiers Orphans HomeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API