Standard Oil Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
CLIFFE, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendant’s objections to *160plaintiff’s application for interrogatories. Defendant has filed elaborate objections categorically directed to the interrogatories. Upon careful consideration of these objections, and examination of the authorities on the subject, I conclude:
First. While many decisions favor the view that where, in a patent infringement suit, treble damages are sought, the defendant should not be compelled to answer interrogatories (see Beacon Folding Machine Co. v. Rotary Machine Co. [D. C.] 17 F.[2d] 934; Healthometer Co.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Taylor v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1924
- Standard Oil Co. v. Roxana Petroleum CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1925
- New Jersey Zinc Co. v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1926
3Cited by4 opinions
- Porto Rican American Tobacco Co. of Porto Rico v. American Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
- Activated Sludge v. Sanitary Dist. of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1946
- Midwest Mfg. Co. v. Staynew Filter Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1935
- Chicago Flexible Shaft Co. v. Neupert Products Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1934