Legal Opinion

Standard Oil Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided July 15, 1927No. 3770PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLIFFE, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on defendant’s objections to *160plaintiff’s application for interrogatories. Defendant has filed elaborate objections categorically directed to the interrogatories. Upon careful consideration of these objections, and examination of the authorities on the subject, I conclude:

First. While many decisions favor the view that where, in a patent infringement suit, treble damages are sought, the defendant should not be compelled to answer interrogatories (see Beacon Folding Machine Co. v. Rotary Machine Co. [D. C.] 17 F.[2d] 934; Healthometer Co.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1924
  2. Standard Oil Co. v. Roxana Petroleum CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1925
  3. New Jersey Zinc Co. v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1926

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Porto Rican American Tobacco Co. of Porto Rico v. American Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
  2. Activated Sludge v. Sanitary Dist. of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1946
  3. Midwest Mfg. Co. v. Staynew Filter Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1935
  4. Chicago Flexible Shaft Co. v. Neupert Products Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API