Legal Opinion
Taylor v. Ford Motor Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided October 31, 1924No. 3820PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILKERSON, District Judge.
Plaintiff has filed interrogatories under rule 58, to all of which defendant objects. One of the grounds assigned is that plaintiff asserts the right to recover threefold damages as provided in section 4921, R. S. (Comp. St. § 9467), and that a court of equity will not require a discovery in aid of such an action. The bill contains averments which, if true, tend to show that the alleged infringement was willful and wanton. The prayer asks for an accounting of profits and damages, and “that, in view of the wanton character of the infringement, such damages be…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. PrenticeSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Superior Construction Co. v. ElmoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
- I. H. P. Corp. v. 210 Central Park South Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
- Beals v. Washington International, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1978
- Coca-Cola Co. v. Dixi-Cola Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1946
- Nichols v. Sanborn Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1938
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.