Legal Opinion
Hayes v. Jackson
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided September 6, 1893PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.
This is an action upon a contract for the sale of land. The judge has found for the plaintiff, and the only question is whether the memorandum was sufficient to satisfy the Statute of Frauds. Pub. Sts. c. 78, § 1, cl. 4. The memorandum, was as follows :
“ Boston, April 6, 1889. Received of Albert H. Hayes one hundred dollars on account of sale of estate number 379 Columbus Avenue, for the sum of $14,140, subject to a mortgage of 8,000 dollars on 44- per cent interest, and I agree to pay the 140 dollars as commission to James C. Tucker. Rents and insurance and interest to be adjusted to date.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Williams v. MorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Violett v. PattonSupreme Court of the United States · 1809
- Gault v. StormontMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Freeland v. RitzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- Wetherbee v. PotterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Shayeb v. HollandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- Silverstein v. KeaneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- White v. Dahlquist Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
- Forman v. GadouasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- Lennox v. MurphyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.