Legal Opinion

Fancher Cattle Co. v. Cascade Packing, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 10, 1980No. 3415-1-IIIPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoe, J.

—We restrict this opinion to one narrow issue. Does the word "purchase" in the following guaranty operate, prospectively only or retrospectively as well? Over plaintiffs' objection, the trial court granted partial summary judgment holding the guaranty operated prospectively only. We affirm. We are concerned only with the written guaranty; there was no contention that there could have been an oral agreement to pay for the debt of another.

Disregarding the salutation and signature, the body of the letter consisted solely of the following paragraph:

This will serve to assure you that in the event…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Friedman v. Virginia Metal Products Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1952
  2. Barber v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Bellingham Securities Syndicate, Inc. v. Bellingham Coal Mines, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Ladum v. Utility Cartage, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Grand Lodge of Scandinavian Fraternity of America, District No. 7 v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1940

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Rainier National Bank v. Inland MacHinery Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  2. Oregon Mut. Ins. Co. v. BartonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  3. Oregon Mutual Insurance v. BartonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  4. Corbray v. StevensonWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Kenney v. ReadCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API