Legal Opinion
Connecticut Rural Roads Improvement Assn. v. Hurley
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 1, 1938PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.
The issue upon the present appeal is the efficacy of the defendant’s demurrer, which was overruled by the Superior Court. The allegations of the substituted complaint are in substance as follows: On and prior to April 28th, 1937, the state highway commissioner, under the provisions of the General Statutes, had and now has the power to lay out, alter, construct or reconstruct, maintain or repair, widen or grade, any highway whenever in his opinion the interests of the State require, exclusive jurisdiction over all highways laid out, constructed, reconstructed or maintained by him, and the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kelly v. DeweySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Savings Bank of Rockville v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Lenox Realty Co. v. HackettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Quinebaug Bank v. TarboxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1850
- Town of Old Saybrook v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- H. Duys Co., Inc. v. ToneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- Sullivan v. Town CouncilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- American Laundry MacHinery, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Bird v. PlunkettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.