State v. Crescent Creamery Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the municipal court of St. Paul, Orr, J.
1Opinion of the Court
START, O. J.
This is an appeal from the judgment of the municipal court of the city of St. Paul convicting the defendant of the offense of selling cream containing less than twenty per centum of fat, contrary to the provisions of Gr. S. 1894, § 7002. The record contains no settled case or bill of exceptions, but the judgment recites upon its face that before sentence the defendant’s counsel moved that the defendant be discharged on the ground that the statute was unconstitutional; hence the facts charged did not constitute a public offense.
Some technical objections are here made to the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Powell v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Butler v. Marshall ChambersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Commonwealth v. EvansMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
- State v. CampbellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1887
- City of Kansas v. CookMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890
3Cited by9 opinions
- McGuire v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Hutchinson Ice Cream Co. v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- State ex rel. Young v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Commonwealth v. WheelerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- People v. RotterMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.