State ex rel. Young v. Standard Oil Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
’Action in tbe district court for ftamsey county by the attorney .general, in the name of the state, to adjudge defendant guilty of unfair discrimination and unfair competition under Laws 1907, c. 369, and to cancel and annul the right, permit and license of defendant to do business in Minnesota, and for such further order in •the premises as will give full force and effect to such cancelation.
Read the full summary
’Action in tbe district court for ftamsey county by the attorney .general, in the name of the state, to adjudge defendant guilty of unfair discrimination and unfair competition under Laws 1907, c. 369, and to cancel and annul the right, permit and license of defendant to do business in Minnesota, and for such further order in •the premises as will give full force and effect to such cancelation. The complaint, in addition to the allegations quoted in the opinion, alleged that defendant distributed and was still selling and distributing kerosene in the cities of St. Paul and Minneapolis at…
1Opinion of the CourtO’Brien, J.
In this action brought upon the relation of the attorney general,, it is sought to forfeit the license to transact business in Minnesota, heretofore issued to defendant, a foreign corporation. The action is based upon an alleged violation of chapter 269, Laws 1901, entitled “An act to prohibit unfair discrimination between different sections, communities or localities, unfair competition, and providing penalties therefor.” Section 1 of the act is:
“Any person, firm, company, association, or corporation, foreign or domestic, doing business in the state of Minnesota and engaged in the…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Strauder v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Smyth v. Ames; Smyth v. Smith; Smyth v. HigginsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Willcox v. Consolidated Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Central Lumber Co. v. South DakotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- State Ex Rel. Pearson v. Probate CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Mathison v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- State v. LangleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1938
- State v. Fairmont Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1911
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.