Bradford v. Pauly
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Shawnee District Court. Action by Bradford as plaintiff, commenced originally against Nelson, Johnson, and Pauly, and charging all as makers of a promissory note. No service on Nelson, and the action was dismissed as to him. Trial at the August Term 1875 of the district court, and findings and judgment in favor of Pauly and Johnson.
Read the full summary
Error from Shawnee District Court. Action by Bradford as plaintiff, commenced originally against Nelson, Johnson, and Pauly, and charging all as makers of a promissory note. No service on Nelson, and the action was dismissed as to him. Trial at the August Term 1875 of the district court, and findings and judgment in favor of Pauly and Johnson. Bradford brings the case here. cited and relied on Firman v. Blood, 2 Kas. 496, and Fuller v. Seott, 8 Kas. 25. cited, Cady v. Shepard, 12 Wis. 639; Davis v. Barron, 13 Wis. 227; Snyder v. Oat-man, 16 Ind. 265; Clapp v.Piae, 13 Gray, 403; Oreenough v.…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
This was an action on a certain promissory note, which reads as follows:
“$75.00. Topeka, Kansas, January 11th, 1874.
March 1st after date, for value received, I promise to pay to the order of N. A. Johnson seventy-five dollars at the Topeka National Bank, Topeka, Kansas, with twelve per cent, interest after maturity, and cost of collecting, including reasonable attorney-fees if suit be instituted on this note.
“F. G. Nelson.”
Indorsed — “N. A. Johnson,” “Lorenzo Pauly.”
G. H. Bradford, the plaintiff in error, was also plaintiff below, and is…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Fuller v. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
- Firman v. BloodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1864
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cornett v. HaferSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
- Braley v. BuchananSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1878
- Commercial National Bank v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901