Cornett v. Hafer
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Stafford District Court. Action to recover on certain promissory notes. The material facts appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
This was an action brought in the district court of Stafford county by L. Hafer, against R. H. Cornett and E. M. Cornett, husband and wife, to recover from them $650 and interest, upon two negotiable promissory notes. Each note was dated “Gunn City, Mo., April 19,1884,” and was executed by S. Z. Hartzler as maker, to the order of R. H. Cornett, payee — one note being for $300, payable on November 1, 1884, and the other note being for $350, payable on December 31, 1884; and each note was indorsed upon the back thereof as follows: “Pay the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Moore v. . CrossNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Vore v. HurstIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
- Cady v. ShepardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
- Blatchford v. MillikenIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
- Milton v. DeYampertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1842
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Buck v. HutchinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Commercial National Bank v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
- Green v. KellerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1898