Locke v. Liquid Air Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Circuit Judge:
Defendant Liquid Air’s Decatur, Alabama, plant manufactures acetylene gas. The resulting by-product of the manufacturing process, a slurry compound of water and lime, is pumped into holding ponds or sludge pits; the lime settles to the bottom, leaving a pool of water. Lime slurry, although having a higher pH content than tapwater, is not toxic or poisonous. For several years the Liquid Air plant in Decatur operated with two slurry holding ponds. A third pond, in which plaintiff James Locke’s son, Sean Locke, drowned, was constructed in 1980 and 1981 to meet the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Sweat v. Miller Brewing Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Tolbert v. GulsbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
- Rose v. Miller & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Alabama Great Southern Railroad Co. v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
- Cox v. Alabama Water Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Casper v. Charles F. Smith & Son, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- Casper v. Chas. F. Smith & Son, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Lapidus v. NCL America LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2013
- Burton v. Carnival CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2024
- Locke v. Liquid Air CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984