Legal Opinion

Cox v. Alabama Water Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 7, 1927No. 6 Div. 818PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSayrb, J.

The report of the ease reproduces counts 1, 4, A, D, and B of the complaint, these counts and the demurrers thereto sufficiently disclosing the questions raised for decision on this appeal. In the trial court a demurrer to each count of the complaint was sustained. Plaintiff thereupon suffered a nonsuit and takes this appeal, in agreement with the provision of section 6431 of the Code.

The effort on the part of plaintiff is to oring his case within some permissible application of the doctrine of the so-called “turntable” eases. Railroad Co. v. Stout, 17 Wall. 657, 21 L. Ed. 745; Union Pacific…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. StoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. United Zinc & Chemical Co. v. BrittSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. City of Indianapolis v. EmmelmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Athey v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railway Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Moseley v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  2. Alabama Great Southern Railroad Co. v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
  3. Williams v. BoldingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  4. Bass v. Quinn-Robbins Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Bailey v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API